Seattle hotels step up to fund tourism promotion

Ted S. Warren / AP

Three months after Washington's tourism office was shuttered, a group of major downtown Seattle hotels is backing a Tourism Improvement Area to fund such promotion through a $2-a-night surcharge on hotel rooms.

It’s no secret that tourists and business travelers bring much-needed dollars to municipalities, but in the face of the unrelenting recession, many state and city budgets for tourism promotion around the nation have been slashed, if not eliminated.

A group of major Seattle hotels, faced with similar problems such as the closure of the Washington state tourism office in June, has thrown their support behind a Tourism Improvement Area to fund such promotion through a $2-a-night surcharge on hotel rooms. San Diego is another city that uses such taxes for promoting tourism.

The money is desperately needed to keep their industry moving forward, said Howard Cohen, president of the Seattle Hotel Association and manager of three downtown hotels for Clise Properties, Inc. When the state of Colorado eliminated its tourism office several years ago, it ended up losing a third of its tourism business, Cohen said.

“We’re trying to take the bull by the horns ourselves,” he said.

Seattle City Councilman Tim Burgess, who first proposed the idea, said that it’s anticipated that $6 million would be raised the first full year of the tax in 2012. “If invested in the (tourism) promotion of Seattle, according to most estimates of economists, it would mean about $30 to $33 million in economic gain,” Burgess said.

The proposed room tax, which will be considered Tuesday by the Seattle City Council Regional Development and Sustainability Committee, has the support of Mayor Mike McGinn, said Brian Surratt, the city’s business development director. If it passes through that committee, it will go before the full City Council on Sept. 26.

Cohen says they hope to have the tax in place by the beginning of November.

Surratt, who called the closure of the state tourism office devastating for destination travel to Washington, said the city was excited to see the private hotel industry step up and embrace the surcharge.

“Tourism dollars are great for economic development,” Surratt said. “It’s outside money coming here that stays here ... It’s a win-win for all. We’ve got roughly 20,000 people employed in tourism here. That’s a huge chunk of our jobs (in Seattle).”

Overall in Washington, tourism is a $15.2 billion industry that supports nearly 144,000 jobs, contributes nearly $1 billion in local and state tax revenues and ranks fourth in Gross Domestic Product produced in Washington, according to the Seattle’s Convention and Visitors Bureau.

The nightly tax would be applied to hotels around downtown Seattle, including the core shopping area, trendy Belltown, the International District and bustling South Lake Union, the new neighborhood of online retail giant Amazon.

“Tourism is a huge industry in our city and this initiative will allow us to promote Seattle both domestically and around the world,” Councilman Burgess said. “Spending $6 million to get $30 million — now that’s a great investment.”

More stories you might like

Discuss this post

Charging tourists extra to try to attract more tourists? That seems counterproductive. Shouldn't hotels in Seattle be decreasing room rates to attract more tourists? Seattle is not "spending $6 million to get $30 million" is inaccurate. Seattle is proposing CHARGING TOURISTS $6 MILLION so that they can make $30 million. Or, am I missing something?

    Reply#1 - Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:06 AM EDT

    The Hotels in Seattle are funding tourism? Are you kidding? Why aren't the hotels getting together and do this out of their own pockets?

    When I come to Seattle it is on business because I have to.

    Now I am going to be forced to contribute to the City's travel promotion program on top of all the various taxes and fees I am already paying? Do people of Seattle believe it is a privilege for visitor's to come to their city? Doesn't a portion of my taxes and fees I pay for my hotel room, rental car, gasoline taxes, sales taxes in restaurants and stores, and use of SEA-TAC pay for anything I use when I come to Seattle? I really do not believe my visits to Seattle have been a burden to its taxpayers. I have never gone to either a baseball or football game and somehow I bet I am contributing to the funding of these facilities, too.

    Just when you thought the government of Washington was coming to terms with its financial health, they are creating another source of mandated funding without being a tax. I sure hope the IRS does not figure out how to launch similar schemes!

      Reply#2 - Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:25 PM EDT

      Really helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge more, I really like the way you explain how it goes.

      <a target="_blank" href="">Boutique Hotels in New York City</a>

        Reply#3 - Tue Sep 27, 2011 7:56 PM EDT
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.